COLESLAW DRESSING vs LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
vs
LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 4
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLESLAW DRESSING | LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 97 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 12.9 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 3.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLESLAW DRESSING | LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLESLAW DRESSING | LITE BALSAMIC VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 567 MG | 677 MG |