COLESLAW DRESSING vs ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
vs
ITALIAN DRESSING: 8
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLESLAW DRESSING | ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 345 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 13.8 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 31.0 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLESLAW DRESSING | ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLESLAW DRESSING | ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 233 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 362 MG | 700 MG |