COLESLAW DRESSING vs CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
vs
CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING: 8
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLESLAW DRESSING | CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 345 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 13.8 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 31.0 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLESLAW DRESSING | CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLESLAW DRESSING | CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 17 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 493 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 362 MG | 833 MG |