COLESLAW DRESSING vs BACON RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
vs
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLESLAW DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 345 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 13.8 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 31.0 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLESLAW DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLESLAW DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 362 MG | 600 MG |