COLESLAW DRESSING vs LITEHOUSE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLESLAW DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
COLESLAW DRESSING: 3
vs
LITEHOUSE: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLESLAW DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 484 cal | 488 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 16.1 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fat | 45.2 g | 48.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLESLAW DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLESLAW DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,097 MG | 767 MG |