COCONUT PALEOKIT vs ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COCONUT PALEOKIT wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
COCONUT PALEOKIT: 6
vs
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COCONUT PALEOKIT | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 311 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 23.0 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 19.7 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 14.8 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COCONUT PALEOKIT | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 8 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COCONUT PALEOKIT | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4.4 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 803 MG | 500 MG |