CLASSIC UNCURED FRANKS vs BUN LENGTH UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUN LENGTH UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC UNCURED FRANKS: 3
vs
BUN LENGTH UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC UNCURED FRANKS | BUN LENGTH UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 310 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 9.5 g | 11.3 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 1.9 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 28.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC UNCURED FRANKS | BUN LENGTH UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.9 MG | 2.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC UNCURED FRANKS | BUN LENGTH UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 849 MG |