CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP vs DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP: 0
vs
DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 933 MG |