CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 552 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 58.6 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | TABLESIDE CAESAR SUPERFOOD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 724 MG | 700 MG |