CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs FAT FREE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FAT FREE RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
FAT FREE RANCH DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | FAT FREE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | FAT FREE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | FAT FREE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 1,033 MG |