CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 0
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 3
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 933 MG | Tie |