CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs VINAIGRETTE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
VINAIGRETTE: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | VINAIGRETTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 643 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | VINAIGRETTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | VINAIGRETTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 967 MG | 357 MG |