CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs PRIVATE SELECTION
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PRIVATE SELECTION wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
PRIVATE SELECTION: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | PRIVATE SELECTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | PRIVATE SELECTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | PRIVATE SELECTION | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 500 MG |