CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs HUMMUS TAHINI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HUMMUS TAHINI wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
HUMMUS TAHINI: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | HUMMUS TAHINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 211 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | HUMMUS TAHINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | HUMMUS TAHINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 141 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 299 MG |