CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs REDUCED FAT VEGENAISE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
REDUCED FAT VEGENAISE: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | REDUCED FAT VEGENAISE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 517 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 55.2 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | REDUCED FAT VEGENAISE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | REDUCED FAT VEGENAISE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 690 MG | 607 MG |