CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs LITEHOUSE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
LITEHOUSE: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 488 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 48.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | LITEHOUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 767 MG |