CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 552 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 58.6 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 724 MG | 833 MG |