CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs SLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLAW DRESSING wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
SLAW DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | SLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 345 cal | 343 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.9 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fat | 37.9 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | SLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | SLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 167 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 966 MG | 540 MG |