CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 20 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 733 MG | 867 MG |