CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs HAMPTON CREEK SPREAD & DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 5
vs
HAMPTON CREEK SPREAD & DRESSING: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | HAMPTON CREEK SPREAD & DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 643 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | HAMPTON CREEK SPREAD & DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | HAMPTON CREEK SPREAD & DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 536 MG |