CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 22.6 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 35.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 484 MG |