CLASSIC PREMIUM COOKED HAM vs ITALIAN STYLE SMALL PLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC PREMIUM COOKED HAM: 4
vs
ITALIAN STYLE SMALL PLATE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC PREMIUM COOKED HAM | ITALIAN STYLE SMALL PLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 311 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 22.6 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 15.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC PREMIUM COOKED HAM | ITALIAN STYLE SMALL PLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC PREMIUM COOKED HAM | ITALIAN STYLE SMALL PLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 212 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,232 MG | 1,271 MG |