CLASSIC PORK RINDS vs DRAGONFLY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRAGONFLY wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC PORK RINDS: 3
vs
DRAGONFLY: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | DRAGONFLY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 50 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | DRAGONFLY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | DRAGONFLY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,500 MG | 679 MG |