CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB vs CHICKEN PRETZEL ROLL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN PRETZEL ROLL wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB: 4
vs
CHICKEN PRETZEL ROLL: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB | CHICKEN PRETZEL ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 198 cal | 194 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 15.5 g | 24.2 g | |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 5.2 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB | CHICKEN PRETZEL ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.2 MG | 1.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB | CHICKEN PRETZEL ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 72 MG | 81 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 768 MG | 540 MG |