CLASSIC CANNED MEAT vs PATE DE CAMPAGNE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CANNED MEAT wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC CANNED MEAT: 4
vs
PATE DE CAMPAGNE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC CANNED MEAT | PATE DE CAMPAGNE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 446 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 8.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 44.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC CANNED MEAT | PATE DE CAMPAGNE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC CANNED MEAT | PATE DE CAMPAGNE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,411 MG | 571 MG |