CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING vs BALSAMIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING: 6
vs
BALSAMIC DRESSING: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 429 MG |