CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs HARD CIDER BRATWURST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARD CIDER BRATWURST wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 3
vs
HARD CIDER BRATWURST: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 262 cal | 271 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 21.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,024 MG | 588 MG |