CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs RED FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 4
vs
RED FRANKS: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | RED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | RED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | RED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 95 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,036 MG | 1,024 MG |