CLASSIC BRITTLE vs BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC BRITTLE wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
CLASSIC BRITTLE: 5
vs
BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC BRITTLE | BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 324 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 79.4 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC BRITTLE | BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC BRITTLE | BLUE RASPBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 0 MG |