CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS vs CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS: 4
vs
CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 280 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 22 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | CLASSIC BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 107 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 880 MG | 1,036 MG |