CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS vs REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 204 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 16.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fat | 23.2 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 875 MG | 918 MG |