CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 40.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 119 MG | 0 MG |