CINNAMON ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CINNAMON ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CINNAMON ALMONDS: 5
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CINNAMON ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 534 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 24.1 g | |
| Carbs | 53.3 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 44.8 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CINNAMON ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CINNAMON ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 200 MG | 34 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 14.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 17 MG |