CHUM SALMON SIDES vs 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHUM SALMON SIDES: 3
vs
16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHUM SALMON SIDES | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHUM SALMON SIDES | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHUM SALMON SIDES | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 429 MG | 357 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 49 MG | 89 MG |