CHOW CHOW vs CLASSIC HUMMUS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC HUMMUS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOW CHOW: 3
vs
CLASSIC HUMMUS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOW CHOW | CLASSIC HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 14.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOW CHOW | CLASSIC HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 34.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOW CHOW | CLASSIC HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 250 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 411 MG |