CHOPPED WALNUTS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOPPED WALNUTS: 3
vs
EMERALD: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOPPED WALNUTS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOPPED WALNUTS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOPPED WALNUTS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 536 MG |