CHOPPED HAM vs SLICED AGED LOW & SLOW PROSCIUTTO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLICED AGED LOW & SLOW PROSCIUTTO wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOPPED HAM: 2
vs
SLICED AGED LOW & SLOW PROSCIUTTO: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOPPED HAM | SLICED AGED LOW & SLOW PROSCIUTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOPPED HAM | SLICED AGED LOW & SLOW PROSCIUTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOPPED HAM | SLICED AGED LOW & SLOW PROSCIUTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 2,429 MG |