CHOPPED CLAMS vs SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPPED CLAMS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOPPED CLAMS: 5
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOPPED CLAMS | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 10.9 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOPPED CLAMS | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOPPED CLAMS | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 73 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 364 MG | 282 MG |