CHOCOLATES COVERED MINTS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATES COVERED MINTS: 2
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATES COVERED MINTS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 562 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 65 g | 56.3 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 34.4 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATES COVERED MINTS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATES COVERED MINTS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 12 MG | 219 MG |