CHOCOLATE SILK COATED TRUFFLES vs COLONIAL ASSORTMENT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLONIAL ASSORTMENT wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE SILK COATED TRUFFLES: 3
vs
COLONIAL ASSORTMENT: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE SILK COATED TRUFFLES | COLONIAL ASSORTMENT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 472 cal | 458 cal | |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 4.2 g | |
| Carbs | 63.9 g | 62.5 g | |
| Fat | 22.2 g | 22.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE SILK COATED TRUFFLES | COLONIAL ASSORTMENT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE SILK COATED TRUFFLES | COLONIAL ASSORTMENT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 167 MG | 83 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 83 MG | 83 MG | Tie |