CHOCOLATE FLAVORED BARK COATING vs LITE WHIPPED DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE WHIPPED DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE FLAVORED BARK COATING: 3
vs
LITE WHIPPED DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE FLAVORED BARK COATING | LITE WHIPPED DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE FLAVORED BARK COATING | LITE WHIPPED DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE FLAVORED BARK COATING | LITE WHIPPED DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 867 MG |