CHOCOLATE COVERED CRANBERRIES vs CANDY-COATED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANDY-COATED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED CRANBERRIES: 4
vs
CANDY-COATED ALMONDS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED CRANBERRIES | CANDY-COATED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 475 cal | 438 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 67.5 g | 78.1 g | |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 14.1 g | |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COVERED CRANBERRIES | CANDY-COATED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED CRANBERRIES | CANDY-COATED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 75 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 203 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 25 MG | 0 MG |