CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT MACAROONS vs OATMEAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL COOKIES wins in 4 out of 13 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT MACAROONS: 2
vs
OATMEAL COOKIES: 4
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT MACAROONS | OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 60.7 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT MACAROONS | OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED COCONUT MACAROONS | OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 89 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 107 MG | 446 MG |