CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS vs RICH DARK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RICH DARK CHOCOLATE wins in 9 out of 13 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS: 3
vs
RICH DARK CHOCOLATE: 9
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 406 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 56.3 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 16.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 94 MG | 300 MG | |
| Copper, Cu | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 7.7 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 223 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 225 MG | 633 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 78 MG | 0 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 3.3 MG |