CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS vs FERRIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 6
vs
FERRIS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | FERRIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 600 cal | 679 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 53.3 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | FERRIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 1 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | FERRIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 0 MG |