CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS vs DRY ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRY ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 2
vs
DRY ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | DRY ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 525 cal | 565 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 55 g | 16.5 g | |
| Fat | 32.5 g | 51.8 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 9.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | DRY ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | DRY ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 150 MG | 235 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 447 MG |