CHOCOLATE COOKIE WITH MARSHMALLOWS vs REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 9 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COOKIE WITH MARSHMALLOWS: 3
vs
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COOKIE WITH MARSHMALLOWS | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COOKIE WITH MARSHMALLOWS | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 750 MG |