CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING vs BACON BALSAMIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
BACON BALSAMIC DRESSING: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | BACON BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 63.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | BACON BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | BACON BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 600 MG |