CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 387 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 12.9 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 35.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 65 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 226 MG | 100 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 871 MG | 933 MG |