CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING vs CALIFORNIA FRENCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CALIFORNIA FRENCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 1
vs
CALIFORNIA FRENCH DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | CALIFORNIA FRENCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 273 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 24.2 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 18.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | CALIFORNIA FRENCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | CALIFORNIA FRENCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,067 MG | 1,121 MG |